A very interesting visual. A quick question, why is there so much variation in the data pre-1944? Was there a methodology change in the data collection? Or was there a systematic lifestyle change?
I'd believe either, but am leaning towards a difference in data collection. The biggest variation is due to the influenza outbreak, so it's possible the other variations correlate with other large public health issues. Perhaps post-WWII something happened in the health care space?
Any views or opinions expressed here do not necessarily represent the views of the CDC, HHS, or any other entity of the United States government. Furthermore, the use of any product names, trade names, images, or commercial sources is for identification purposes only, and does not imply endorsement or government sanction by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Girls Count, So Why Don’t We Count Girls?
-
We know that investing in girls is crucial to achieving our overall health
and development goals. So why isn’t more being done? Tamara Kreinin,
executive d...
Native Americans Hit Hard By H1N1
-
Earlier this month, the Center for Disease Control and prevention announced
that the current wave of the pandemic H1N1, or swine flu, virus appears to
have...
Global Outreach Committee Annual Meeting Summary
-
At its meeting during the 8th Annual ISDS Conference in Miami, FL, the
Global Outreach Committee acknowledged the work of Duncan Cooper over the
past year ...
Earth Engine, powered by Google
-
I'm here in Copenhagen this week, at the COP15 International Climate Change
Conference. Whether you're attending in-person, or reading news headlines
from ...
Visualizing Swedish development aid
-
How can Swedish bi- and multilateral development cooperation be visualized?
The Swedish Agency for Development Evaluation (SADEV) maintains a database
with...
Release of 2008 education data by UIS
-
The UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) has announced the release of new
education statistics for the year 2008. For 70 countries, new data on
primary ed...
2 comments:
profound and simple!
A very interesting visual. A quick question, why is there so much variation in the data pre-1944? Was there a methodology change in the data collection? Or was there a systematic lifestyle change?
I'd believe either, but am leaning towards a difference in data collection. The biggest variation is due to the influenza outbreak, so it's possible the other variations correlate with other large public health issues. Perhaps post-WWII something happened in the health care space?
(edited slightly, I misread the title :)
Post a Comment